Saturday , May 28 2016

Home » The Daily » The Daily: 21st Century Revolutions
The Daily: 21st Century Revolutions

The Daily: 21st Century Revolutions

February 21, 2014 7:25 am by: Category: The Daily Leave a comment A+ / A-

Our round-up of news, notes, tips, and Tweets exhibiting how public diplomacy affects the world each and every day.

I can’t put my finger on it, but between the amazing photographs and the use of the Internet as a soundboard for both sides, the popular protest in Ukraine feels different than previous ones. Is this the new reality of 21st century conflicts when the Internet connections remain unblocked?

 

Tentative agreement reached overnight as announced by the government:

 

And of course, there are fascinating mediated public diplomacy implications to this. A quick click over to RT, Russia’s international broadcasting arm, and you can see how the situation is being framed by those sympathetic with the government.

Violence escalated on Tuesday after a group of radicals taking part in a “peaceful march” of the opposition attempted to storm the building of the Ukrainian parliament (Verkhovna Rada). They were repelled by police cordons. The move came despite the agreement on amnesty finally reached between the government and the opposition. [RT]

 

Then there are the tweets:

 

 

I like that Twiplomacy is collecting exchanges like this one between Carl Bildt, Toomas Hendrik Ilves and MFA Russia. Fiesty.

 

The former director of the Voice of America gives context to the role of press freedom and public diplomacy in Ukraine.

In mid-2005 I went back to Kiev. The new government was now eager to get programs from VOA, which could help show their newly liberated journalists how journalism should be practiced. But my most interesting meeting was with several members of Parliament who peppered me with questions about freedom of the press, and how it works. They didn’t have any experience in that area, and they wanted Ukraine to get it right. Should journalists be licensed? Can they print whatever they want? What happens when a story is wrong? Can anyone own a newspaper? [Public Diplomacy Council]

 

And let’s not forgot the other popular protest happening right now in Venezuela, and the mediated public diplomacy implications of telling that story.

Mr Maduro also lashed out against the coverage of the protests by foreign news organisations. “Enough war propaganda, I won’t accept war propaganda against Venezuela. If they don’t rectify themselves, out of Venezuela, CNN, out,” he said. A spokeswoman for the US network, only available on cable in Venezuela, told the BBC it did not have any immediate comments about Mr Maduro’s comments. Last week, the government removed Colombian TV news channel NTN24 from channels offered by Venezuelan cable operators. The government has been highly critical of international media coverage, while protesters say they are concerned with a lack of media freedom, says the BBC’s correspondent in Caracas, Irene Caselli. [BBC]

 

 

Interesting talk given by Maurice Fraser concerning the European Union’s increasing use of soft power over hard power.

The third priority is to stop placing all our eggs in the “soft power” basket. Of course it is one of our strongest cards, but it doesn’t work with murderous tyrants and autocrats bent on genocide. Soft power is splendid, and there are always ways to fine-tune its instruments and play our hand more cleverly in terms of trade, aid, visas, cultural exchange, EU membership and so on. But soft power is no magic wand. The fourth priority is to recognise that although “civilian power” is a crucial component of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and something Europeans do very well on the whole (think of Kosovo and Georgia for starters), hard power is every bit as important. I shall come back to this. [European Council on Foreign Relations]

 

South Korean prime minister heads to Sochi to promote the next Olympic Winter Games as well as other bilateral issues with Russia. Curious why he waited until the final days.

South Korean Prime Minister Chung Hong-won embarked on a trip to Sochi Thursday for talks with his Russian counterpart and the international Olympics committee chief to promote PyeongChang as the host for the next games, his office said. During his five-day visit to the Russian city of Sochi, Chung is scheduled to meet with International Olympics Committee President Thomas Bach to explore ways to cooperate for the successful holding of the upcoming PyeongChang Winter Olympics in 2018. [Global Post]

 

 

Sounds like Tanzania has embraced sports diplomacy, or at a least sports-oriented nation brand: train local athletes abroad to compete better at international events in order to bring more attention to your country.

The diplomacy, which is meant to enhance capacity building amongst the sportsmen and women, will include sending local athletes to other countries and learn new tactics and improve their performance. This was said on Thursday  by Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Minister, Benard Membe, who insisted that it was high time local athletes also shine in international competitions. “We are now set to practice sport diplomacy and we will try to send our local athletes outside the country to learn new techniques in sports. When this is implemented as planned, we believe we will get positive results at the international stage,” he noted. [Daily News]

 

This is a decent introduction to public diplomacy 2.0 and, more specifically, Twiplomacy. It unfortunately does not take on any of the interesting implications or criticism of the field though.

Nowadays the number of official Twitter accounts is growing as well as the number of their followers. However, Twiplomacy is still developing and has, consequently, some weak points that should be taken into account. First, not every leader is connected to the net, and many of them have created an account only recently. Second, we also have to consider that this social network is not equally popular in every nation—probably this is also why many governments also use Twitter as an automated news feed from their website or Facebook page. Third, the same leaders do not agree on the nature of messages they should write—more personal or political in nature? Fourth, politicians seem not to have understood the primary tool of social networks: to connect people with each other. The more connected leader mutually follows only 44 peers. [Diplomatic Courier]

 

I dig Xinhua’s increasingly savvy use of Twitter.

 

 

 

photo credit: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

CNN Digitalmaidan digitial diplomacy Euromaidan Kiev Maurice Fraser MFA Russia popular protests press freedom RT social media week Toomas Hendrik Ilves Ukraine Xinhua
The Daily: 21st Century Revolutions Reviewed by on . Our round-up of news, notes, tips, and Tweets exhibiting how public diplomacy affects the world each and every day. [divide] I can’t put my finger on it, but be Our round-up of news, notes, tips, and Tweets exhibiting how public diplomacy affects the world each and every day. [divide] I can’t put my finger on it, but be Rating: 0

About Michael Ardaiolo

Michael Ardaiolo is currently a student in Syracuse University's Public Diplomacy Master's Program: M.A. in International Relations from the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs and M.S. in Public Relations from the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications. In addition, he is a recovering record slinger, a Criterion Collection addict, an NBA obsessor, and a struggling student of the Korean language.

Leave a Comment


scroll to top